Determinism is the Incompatible with Free

Determinism is the Incompatible with Free Will Essay Free will defined in Webster’s Dictionary is the power of making free choices by outer agencies, and the ability or judgment to choose. In the Christian point of view, free will is what separates us form the animals. It is because we have free will we are able to identify what is good and bad. Free will is understood that all human beings have the ability to due what they want to do, and live there life by there own choices. But how can we know if we truly have free will, what if free will is only an illusion that the human mind has created for us. Do we really make choices in our life because we want to or because we have to? According to Holbach, free will is an illusion that the human mind has created for us. He claims that free will is caused by the environment around us and that motivates our choices in life. These motives can create wish in our mind that can effect our actions. He says that our actions are a result from our choices that we make, and every choice that we make is a result from a cause. He believes that there is no such thing as a pure choice out of free will. He thinks that our actions are made not because we want to but because we need to. These choices can be a result from past experience or motivations from time situations. To give an example a student that goes to school, you could say that the student is going to school because he wants to go, but why would a child want to go to school? The answer is simple It is because there are motives that are making the student want to go to school. These motives can be subconsciously made for the student. This example proves that to make a choice out of free will then the student must make his choice whether he wants to go to school with out any motive, but for the human mind this is an impossible decision. To succeed in life one must attend school, and to succeed in school one must study hard. This leaves the student with no choice but to attend school, so the student’s choice of going to school is not driven by his desires but rather of his motive to succeed in life, and if the student chooses not to attend school then he might be driven the choice not to attend school because he does not like studying which makes the idea of free will false. The student might decide not to go to school because in school he would have to study which he has no desire of doing and if he does go to school he is going not of free will but rather of survival for is own future. , which makes the basic idea of free choice false. In otherwise, the actions of humans are never free; they are always influenced by other sources such as for our own happiness, opinions, past, and daily experiences. Holbach says that having the option of choice does not necessarily mean that one is given free will. Hey says that choices are more like a necessary motive that has been created in front of us, just like the student that goes to school. He is driven by his own desires. Then how can someone say that he is free if his choices that he makes are decided with a reason to it. Men are guided in each step of their lives by their own driven passion, which makes all there choices calculated for a curtain outcome. All of our actions that we make in life are a result form our choices. If a man tried to kill him self what are some motives that will stop the men from killing himself. One will say that if he killed himself then he will die and that would be meaningless. In another situation let say that the men wanted to test his own God given free will and decides to kill himself, this action makes him no different from the man who does not kill himself. They are both driven with different motive that makes them result in their actions. Our actions result in our choices that we make. Every choice that is laid out for us has a motive in the beginning, and in eventually these motives turn into determinations which drives the human brain to respond in curtion ways. The result of the human mind and the illusion of free will is that the human actions are moved by the cause. If all people were able to see their motions carefully they will all discover that there fantasy of free will is only but an illusion. Even though our actions appear to be due to free will, but all actions are actually predetermined factors. They are choices in our heads that has already been made for us. This means that our lives have already been chosen for us even before we decide it. One major objection that I have from this argument is that if people don’t have free will, then that means that all people wouldn’t have any moral responsibility for there actions, but people are morally responsible for their actions. If we did not have free will then that will mean that their will be no good people in the world. If every decision was made because of our own desires then that will mean that we will choose most of the time the bad choices, because most of our desires are self centered. It is because of free will we are able to define what is good and bad. The reasons that we have motives are because they sometimes conflict between what is good and bad. It is because we have free will that we try to due the right things. Moral effort cannot exist without a motive. I believe this to be good objection against the idea that free will is only an illusion created by the mind. If all actions were a result from a cause and motive that we already know of. Then all actions should be predictable, but most actions are not predicable they have many outcomes. If motivation was the only thing that drives us to choose in our lives then their will be no point of living. It is because of the idea of free will we wake up in the morning, knowing that we don’t know what is going to happen tomorrow. The illusion of freewill talks about the possibility of a deterministic world, but determinism is such a depressing view of the world. Free will is what powers the world, creates societies, and maintains order. Maybe the illusion of free will is for the better for all mankind.